TheUnited States Department of Commerce will apply the average complaint rate toapply for a separate tax rate application for corporate decision is notreasonable, because it does not consider the record of alternative data duringthe survey period. In addition, although the U. S. Department of Commerce ruledNingbo Jiulong steel investment amount in using the adverse facts availablelegal and substantive evidence to support, but the U. S. Department of commercedoes not use including corporate tax rates alone questionnaire, including otherdocumented information there is no substantial evidence to support.
TheUnited States International Trade Court ruling, the case was returned to the U.S.Department of Commerce to re trial, the U.S. Department of Commerce to request:1 based on substantial evidence and the law to make a ruling. 2. In the processof re trial, the U. S. commerce department shall keep a record of the surrogatedata were re examined, and accordingly determine the individual tax rate forenterprises dumping margin, which is in line with the Ministry of Commerce todetermine the dumping margin as accurately as possible the duties. 3. TheMinistry of Commerce of Ningbo Kowloon rates ruling with 19U.S., 1677e (c)provisions; at the same time to explain, Ningbo Kowloon provided by suppliersto test certificate and the company prepared for consumers to determine NingboKowloon sold in the United States involved, the product of the number of factsor adverse causes both the fact that test certificate does not match theavailable. 4 the Ministry of Commerce shall re solicit any informationnecessary to re award. 5 the Ministry of Commerce shall, with the completion ofthe re ruling in November 19, 2012, 30 days of the issuance of the ruling, andwithin 15 days of the date of publication of the review.